[Bug regression/49572] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c scan-tree-dump-times cddce2 ".rtmem" 0

[rguenther at suse dot de]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572

--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-06-30 10:42:21 UTC ---
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572
> 
> --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-30 10:30:28 UTC ---
> > For loads yes.
> 
> OK, what's the right predicate to use on the RHS here?  !is_gimple_val?

Do we ever end up with stores in that function?  I doubt so given
that expr->ops.single.rhs is set to RHS1.  ISTR DOM enters a load
for a store operation.  So just unconditionally use the type
of rhs1.