[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813

--- Comment #49 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-07-27 22:56:10 UTC ---
Thanks for your feedback Kaveh. Note, however, that, as I mentioned only today
in Comment #45, with -m32 we have problems also with the overload for double, I
have no idea how to fix it. More generally, I would be *really* curious to
understand what's so special about isinf vs isnan and the other classification
facilities, only isinf gives me troubles...