[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr

[vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813

--- Comment #23 from vincenzo Innocente <vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch> 2011-07-22 16:48:35 UTC ---
would  http://lwg.github.com/issues/lwg-active.html#2013 allow gcc to declare
constexpr the x86 builtins (and corresponding wrapper functions)?
I would be interested to have constepxr vectors (__m128 etc)