[Bug driver/45508] Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make sense?

[ro at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.07.18 16:06:22
                 CC|                            |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
          Component|middle-end                  |driver
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-18 16:06:22 UTC ---
I think handling this via specs is the wrong (read: far too complicated)
approach.
I agree that gcc/g++/... not adding needed RPATHs to its runtime libraries is
a major nuissance for every site with more than a single system and a central
installation of gcc and it has bothered me for a long time.

I'm (slowly) working towards a generic approach to solve this problem, maybe
I'll have something ready for gcc 4.7.0.