[Bug middle-end/47383] ivopts miscompiles Pmode != ptr_mode

pinskia at gmail dot com gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Jan 21 11:54:00 GMT 2011


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com <pinskia at gmail dot com> 2011-01-21 11:43:45 UTC ---
Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T
On Jan 20, 2011 21:34, hjl.tools at gmail dot com
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: 

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383



--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-01-21
05:33:53 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #3)

> The ivopts pass transforms

> 

> 

>   unsigned int D.2715;

>   unsigned int D.2716;

> ...

>   D.2715_43 = (unsigned int) elems_3(D);

>   D.2716_42 = D.2715_43 + 4294967295;

>   n_49 = (int) D.2716_42;

> 

> leads o the wrong result when Pmode != unsigned int. Adding

> -fno-ivopts fixes the bug.

> 



This is OK due to cast to int. But



  long unsigned int D.2757;

  long unsigned int D.2749;

  long unsigned int D.2750;

  unsigned int ivtmp.20;

  int D.2748;

  unsigned int ivtmp.17;

...

  D.2749_6 = (long unsigned int) prephitmp.8_18;

  D.2750_34 = ivtmp.17_28 - D.2749_6;

  MEM[symbol: heap, index: D.2750_34, step: 8, offset: 2296B] = n_11;



Mem here should have been rejected.


looks wrong since it assumes D.2750_34 can be negative. But

D.2750_34 is unsigned. It won't work when ptr_mode == unsigned

and Pmode is unsigned long long.



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list