[Bug libstdc++/49204] [C++0x] remaining issues in <future>

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49204

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-30 13:10:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> doesn't handle non-timed waiting functions, but I'm not convinced they
> should block.

Reported as http://cplusplus.github.com/LWG/lwg-active.html#2100