[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760

--- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-27 13:08:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> PS: C++1x is private jargon, but well, as -std= argument, together with c++0x
> we'll need something more realistic, at some point, don't you think? ;)

At some point, yes: after the standard is ratified, at which point we won't
need an 'x'.  :)