[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760

--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-04-26 14:54:12 UTC ---
Thanks Joseph for the explanation and the references. Now maybe I'm digressing
in terms of the C++ issue we are facing, but I'm wondering: at some point, even
for C99, shouldn't we support imaginary types?