[Bug middle-end/45508] Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make sense?

[nicolai dot stange at zmaw dot de]

------- Comment #3 from nicolai dot stange at zmaw dot de  2010-09-02 20:15 -------
> You could use a small wrapper script that adds R option instead of a  
> specs file or adds the specs file to the command line.
This would change nothing:
- The bootstrapping problem remains
- Whether I add a specs file or a wrapper script for every gcc release's
deployment doesn't make a great difference (except that I would not have to
check the default specs for changes every time)

It is not a question whether it is possible to work around it (I've already
done it), but whether it would be good to provide a more convenient way and
whether enough people would benefit from this patch to justify it.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508