[Bug middle-end/43057] [LTO] fold check: original tree changed by fold
ubizjak at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Nov 20 16:28:00 GMT 2010
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43057
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2010.11.20 16:13:06
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2010-11-20 16:13:06 UTC ---
Following untested patch fixes the failure:
Index: fold-const.c
===================================================================
--- fold-const.c (revision 166974)
+++ fold-const.c (working copy)
@@ -13415,7 +13415,7 @@ fold_ternary_loc (location_t loc, enum t
a COND, which will recurse. In that case, the COND_EXPR
is probably the best choice, so leave it alone. */
&& type == TREE_TYPE (arg0))
- return pedantic_non_lvalue_loc (loc, arg0);
+ return pedantic_non_lvalue_loc (loc, unshare_expr (arg0));
/* Convert A ? 0 : 1 to !A. This prefers the use of NOT_EXPR
over COND_EXPR in cases such as floating point comparisons. */
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list