[Bug c++/44548] Link error when defining templated static const variable

[redi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-16 12:11 -------
(In reply to comment #4) 
> So what the above code actually means? Is it valid?

Yes, it's valid. It declares an explicit specialization, which inhibits the
implicit instantiation of the default specialization.

In order for the code to be valid a definition must be provided. It isn't, so
you get a link error.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44548