[Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available

[redi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-11 10:27 -------
A question: apart from quoting chapter and verse from the standard (8.5
[dcl.init], para 9 in C++03, para 6 in C++0x,) how could the diagnostic have
been any clearer?

It indicates you can use -fpermissive to relax the warning, and it includes a
note telling you the type has no user-provided default constructor, which is
true.  Why would you assume this is a bug, when a developer has gone to the
trouble of writing the note?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499