[Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants
Dodji Seketeli
dodji@redhat.com
Wed Jun 9 14:32:00 GMT 2010
"manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> $ ./cc1 -quiet test.c
>> While expanding macro OPERATE at test.c:2:8
>> While expanding macro SHIFTL at test.c:5:14
>> While expanding macro MULT2 at test.c:8:3
>> test.c: In function 'g':
>> test.c:13:3: error: invalid operands to binary << (have 'double' and 'int')
> Also, what are the column numbers pointing to? They don't make sense
> to me.
About this line:
>> While expanding macro OPERATE at test.c:2:8
which is about:
#define OPERATE(OPRD1, OPRT, OPRD2) \
OPRD1 OPRT OPRD2;
Column 8 is the starting column of the OPRT token.
About this line:
>> While expanding macro SHIFTL at test.c:5:14
which is about:
#define SHIFTL(A,B) \
OPERATE (A,<<,B)
Column 14 is the starting column of the '<<' token.
About this line:
>> While expanding macro MULT2 at test.c:8:3
which is about:
#define MULT2(A) \
SHIFTL (A,1)
Column 3 is the starting column of the 'SHIFT' token.
> In any case, this is a huge step forward! Thanks for working on this. It would
> be an important marketing point if you manage to complete it for GCC
> 4.6.
No problem ;) Not sure it'll get into 4.6, but I'll try.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list