[Bug libstdc++/45093] Different definitions of _Rb_tree::{erase,_M_destroy_node} between C++98 and C++0x

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

------- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-07-27 11:14 -------
Well, this specific snippet will work at some point, because we want to use
namespace association for the C++0x containers. Of course no binary
compatibility in general, C++0x and C++98 code will not be allowed in general
to interoperate, for *many* reasons (just as an example std::list will be
changed to have a constant time size in C++0x)


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45093