[Bug libgomp/45025] Memory ordering issues with libgomp critical sections and __sync

[Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com]

------- Comment #3 from Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com  2010-07-22 18:03 -------
Is there a plan for more complete C++0x/C1x atomics support?  Something
eventually needs to implement the memory_order_acquire/memory_order_release
versions of these primitives?  Nptl also seems to be in need of these.  I agree
that it would be unfortunate to use inline assembly code here at this point in
time.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45025