[Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Jan 8 10:11:00 GMT 2010
------- Comment #16 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-08 10:11 -------
For completeness: I just committed support for the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-01/msg00049.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-01/msg00192.html
which is treated as no op.
One needs to think carefully whether one needs to take care of ASYNCHRONOUS for
the middle end when real async I/O is implemented. For a simple:
write(9, ..., asynchronous='yes') foo
...
write(9, ...) ! force WAIT on unit 9
foo = 8
presumably not using "&foo" in the first write call lets the address escape
thus unless a function is known (to the ME) to not touch "foo" (indirectly), no
problem should occur. But how about:
! Note: using "foo" in AIO implies the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute for foo
write(9, ..., asynchronous='yes', id=waitid) foo
call finish(foo, waitid)
contains
subroutine finish(var, wait)
asynchronous :: var
wait(wait)
var = 7
end subroutine finish
Here, the ME might be tempted to change the order of WAIT and "var = 7"; thus
in this case we probably need to tell the ME about the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list