[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized members in constructor

[bart dot vanassche at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #10 from bart dot vanassche at gmail dot com  2010-02-24 19:10 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> I think there is no reasonable way to get reliable uninitialized variable
> warnings for incoming pointed-to memory.  The only way we can warn here
> is by inlining the constructor into the caller to see either a static
> variable or the memory allocation.

Why would inlining the constructor be necessary ? Does this mean that it is not
possible to mark member variables as uninitialized in gcc ?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808