[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized members in constructor

[jason at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-24 16:43 -------
What else could it be than a pointer?  It might be possible to mark it somehow
so that the middle end knows to consider the referent uninitialized.

Incidentally, perhaps we should mark the this parameter as __restrict...

It does seem reasonable for the front end to detect uses of a member in a
previous mem-initializer, though that wouldn't handle uses in the body.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808