[Bug c++/43120] Diamond virtual inheritence with covariant return type confuses GCC

[goeran at uddeborg dot se]

------- Comment #4 from goeran at uddeborg dot se  2010-02-24 11:02 -------
Created an attachment (id=19944)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19944&action=view)
A different simplification, avoiding the diamond inheritance

The diamond inheritance does not seem to be a requirement.  Here is a case
simplified in a different way, where there is no diamond inheritance any more. 
(This one does print "33" rather than a huge number.  Still wrong, obviously.)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43120