[Bug c++/43054] New: [C++0x] ambiguous overload from identical declarations using decltype
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Feb 12 15:59:00 GMT 2010
template<typename R> struct future { };
#ifndef NO_PROTO
template<typename Fn, typename... Args>
auto
async(Fn&& fn, Args&&... args)
-> future<decltype(fn(args...))>;
#endif
template<typename Fn, typename... Args>
auto
async(Fn&& fn, Args&&... args)
-> future<decltype(fn(args...))>;
int work2(int value);
void work(int value)
{
auto handle = async(work2, value);
}
trunk gives this error:
$ g++45 -std=c++0x -c -fmessage-length=70 pr42819.min2.cc
pr42819.min2.cc: In function 'void work(int)':
pr42819.min2.cc:19:34: error: call of overloaded 'async(int (&)(int),
int&)' is ambiguous
pr42819.min2.cc:6:2: note: candidates are: future<decltype
(fn(async::args ...))> async(Fn&&, Args&& ...) [with Fn = int
(&)(int), Args = {int&}, decltype (fn(async::args ...)) = int]
pr42819.min2.cc:12:2: note: future<decltype
(fn(async::args ...))> async(Fn&&, Args&& ...) [with Fn = int
(&)(int), Args = {int&}, decltype (fn(async::args ...)) = int]
pr42819.min2.cc:19:34: error: unable to deduce 'auto' from
'<expression error>'
The declarations are identical and the error goes away if you define NO_PROTO.
--
Summary: [C++0x] ambiguous overload from identical declarations
using decltype
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 42819
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43054
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list