[Bug other/46695] [4.6 regression] failure to build X from darwin to cris-elf with lto enabled
iains at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Dec 1 12:43:00 GMT 2010
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-01 12:42:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> >
> > > not I,
> > > the addition of -no-undefined was from the Dave K. who needs it to get a .dll
> > > to build
> > > - without that change, everything is hunky-dory with libtool defaults.
> >
> > Based on our off-list discussion, I thought that it actually required an
> > explicit "-undefined dynamic_lookup"?
>
> Ah, hang on, I re-read our earlier emails and think I misunderstood. My
> understanding now is that that is what you get by default, so simply /not/
> passing "-no-undefined" on Darwin is all that is required. That is how I will
> respin the patch.
indeed .. a mid-air collision ;)
yes, I have checked (at rev. 167243) that simply deleting the "-no-undefined
-bindir ..." addition is enough.
Originally, I thought we needed to add it explicitly (and, of course, your
patch works).
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list