[Bug c/45468] gcc does not warn about missing `-O' flag when specifying `-Wuninitialized'
jellegeerts at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Aug 31 20:36:00 GMT 2010
------- Comment #5 from jellegeerts at gmail dot com 2010-08-31 20:36 -------
With `gcc -std=c99 -Wuninitialized -O0' I get no warning for the following code
snippet (I do with `-O1' though), so it still seems GCC 4.5.1 should warn about
`-O' not being specified.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
for (int i; i < 32; ++i)
{
printf("%d\n", i);
}
return 0;
}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
--
jellegeerts at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45468
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list