[Bug driver/43687] Unexpected error message for bad command line argument

manu at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Apr 15 22:22:00 GMT 2010



------- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-15 22:21 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> 
> I don't see adding function pointers as a particular improvement over the 
> existing code where switch statements can already handle group options 

That code does not work when options are disabled/enabled from anywhere else
apart from the command line. See PR40989.

With function pointers we can do:

+         if (option->var_type == CLVC_BOOLEAN)
+           {
+             if (option->set)
+               option->set (1);
+             if (option->flag_var)
+               *(int *) option->flag_var = 1;
+           }


> including setting option variables only if they are still -1 (as done for 
> various options at present); marking group options only seems useful to me 
> if the .opt file also lists implications so that the ordering rules are 
> handled automatically.

This could be implemented later by extending Group to Group(option1,option2).
Then the awk scripts would generate the set_ function. But the function
pointers seem as a first step to me.

But if you think it is a bad idea, I will stop now rather than go on and waste
my time.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43687



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list