[Bug tree-optimization/38275] bootstrap failure when -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 is enabled

[razya at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from razya at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-03 08:59 -------
Subject: Bug 38275

Author: razya
Date: Thu Sep  3 08:59:25 2009
New Revision: 151372

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151372
Log:
PR tree-optimization/38275
        * tree-parloops.c (parallelize_loops): Replace profitability condition 
        for expected number of iterations.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-1char.c: Increase number  
        of iterations. Adjust the logic accordingly.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-2char.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-1.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-2.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-3.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-6.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-7.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-8.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-9.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/pr39500-1.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-1short.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-2short.c: Ditto.
        * testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/parallelization-1.c: Ditto.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/parallelization-1.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/pr39500-1.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-1.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-1char.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-1short.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-2.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-2char.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-2short.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-3.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-6.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-7.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-8.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/reduc-9.c
    trunk/gcc/tree-parloops.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38275