[Bug fortran/41831] Bug with management of NaNs

[michael dot baudin at scilab dot org]

------- Comment #3 from michael dot baudin at scilab dot org  2009-10-27 13:32 -------
You are right, this was a bug in the fortran source code.
I cannot add implicit none in this slatec/gamma routine, but 
declaring the return type of the function fixes the bug.
Thank your for looking at this bug.

Best regards,

Michaël


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41831