[Bug tree-optimization/42154] [4.5 Regression] Wrong code from (early) SRA

jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Nov 23 14:02:00 GMT 2009



------- Comment #1 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-11-23 14:01 -------
I'm looking into this.  This example shows why using access->expr to create new
expressions is a dangerous thing to do, at least in some contexts (which I did
not really realize until now). I'd better look at them all.


-- 

jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-11-23 14:01:46
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42154



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list