[Bug fortran/38530] ICE with the example for c_funloc

[dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr]

------- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2009-11-21 20:46 -------
This PR and PR42119 are fixed by the patch in comment #1 of PR42119 without
regression. It also fixes the test in comment #7 pf PR34199.

As far as I can understand the comment

   /* ??? This should be considered a front-end bug.  We should not be
      generating ADDR_EXPR of something that isn't an LVALUE.  The only
      exception here is STRING_CST.  */

there is something wrong in gfortran. Is the patch in comment #2 a step in the
right direction?

As a side note, it would be nice to have the companion C code to have an
executable test in the manual.


-- 

dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38530