[Bug libstdc++/41975] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

------- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-11-07 01:17 -------
This is certainly related, and has been, well I would say, dismissed ìn
Bellevue (I wasn't there, unfortunately, can try to find the minutes)

   http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#579

N2023 seems rather well written to me...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975