[Bug target/40017] [4.4/4.5 Regression] stdbool.h/altivec.h

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-04 14:39 -------
_Bool would need to be a conditional macro too though, I wonder if some ISO C99
pedantry can't test that _Bool isn't defined or something like that.
But then for C++ it is similar with defined(bool) also being true with
-maltivec instead of false.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40017