[Bug c/39525] [easy to fix bug] Docs for C99 "designated initializers" isn't clear what happens to omitted field members
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Mar 23 13:30:00 GMT 2009
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-23 13:30 -------
Hmm, how so? The C standard is clear that these fields are zero initialized if
omitted.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39525
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list