[Bug middle-end/39514] [4.4 Regression] unreported change to packed bitfields

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-21 11:00 -------
I agree that we need to document this change.  And I agree that the new
behavior
is more reasonable.

Can we add this example to changes.html?  It looks different enough than
the existing one.

Did behavior change if you remove the aligned (2) attribute from d?

I'm marking this as a regression to be on the radar.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |ABI, diagnostic
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-03-21 11:00:24
               date|                            |
            Summary|unreported change to packed |[4.4 Regression] unreported
                   |bitfields                   |change to packed bitfields
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39514