[Bug c++/40389] optimizer bug (possibly)
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Jun 10 21:28:00 GMT 2009
------- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-10 21:28 -------
Shorter testcase:
template <typename V> struct S
{
V *f, *l;
__attribute__ ((noinline)) S (void) { f = 0, l = 0; }
void foo (V *x)
{
if (x->p != 0)
x->p->n = x->n;
else
f = x->n;
if (x->n != 0)
x->n->p = x->p;
else
l = x->p;
}
__attribute__ ((noinline)) void bar (V *x)
{
x->n = 0;
x->p = l;
if (l != 0)
l->n = x;
else
f = x;
l = x;
}
};
struct H;
struct A
{
S <H> k;
};
struct H
{
A *a;
H *p, *n;
__attribute__ ((noinline)) H (void) { p = 0, n = 0, a = 0; }
__attribute__ ((noinline)) H (A *b) : a (b)
{
p = n = 0;
if (a != 0)
a->k.bar (this);
}
~H (void) { if (a != 0) a->k.foo (this); }
H &operator= (const H &o)
{
a = o.a;
if (a != 0)
a->k.bar (this);
return *this;
}
};
__attribute__ ((noinline))
H baz (void)
{
return H (new A);
}
H g;
int
main (void)
{
g = baz ();
if (g.a->k.f != &g)
__builtin_abort ();
return 0;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40389
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list