[Bug middle-end/38934] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:398

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-26 16:02 -------
That brings us back to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00532.html
If the gimplifier shouldn't drop TREE_OVERFLOW bits from the IL, then it is
valid to have TREE_OVERFLOWs set and tree-vrp.c needs to deal with it (use
VARYING range or something similar).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38934