[Bug libstdc++/41975] [C++0x] [DR579] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty

[paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com]

------- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-12-22 10:02 -------
Relevant DR reopened:

  http://home.roadrunner.com/~hinnant/issue_review/lwg-active.html#579

Next, we should provide detailed wording...


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED
            Summary|[C++0x] unordered_set::erase|[C++0x] [DR579]
                   |performs worse when nearly  |unordered_set::erase
                   |empty                       |performs worse when nearly
                   |                            |empty


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975