[Bug middle-end/42110] [4.5 Regression] ICE with inlining

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #8 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-08 15:57 -------
So we have new direct call appearing to function that has been previously
eliminated as unreachable (after inlining) as a result of devirtualization? 
In general if function have address taken, we should not remove it since it is
needed, or is that the special vtable handling?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42110