[Bug c++/42292] fundamental type have an associated namespace?

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-05 00:05 -------
There are two different issues here, only is the place where we instantiated
foo<bool> is wrong but the second issue is even weird and I think there is a
C++ defect report about it (do fundamental types have associated namespace).


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|gcc should reject code      |fundamental type have an
                   |violating the two-phase     |associated namespace?
                   |look-up rules (related to   |
                   |bug 42291)                  |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42292