[Bug libstdc++/42273] New: atomic_2.h:111: = instead of == in if

[to dot roma dot from dot bugcc at qwertty dot com]

Is it a silly bug or a contrived way of calling __sync_synchronize regardless
of the required memory_order?

--- atomic_2.h  2009-12-04 11:23:26.000000000 +0200
+++ atomic_2.h  2009-12-04 11:23:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
        {
          // write_mem_barrier();
          _M_i = __v;
-         if (__m = memory_order_seq_cst)
+         if (__m == memory_order_seq_cst)
            __sync_synchronize();
        }
     }


-- 
           Summary: atomic_2.h:111: = instead of == in if
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: to dot roma dot from dot bugcc at qwertty dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42273