[Bug c++/25185] deep typedef substitution in error message

[jason at redhat dot com]

------- Comment #24 from jason at redhat dot com  2009-04-06 15:32 -------
Subject: Re:  deep typedef substitution in error message

dave at boostpro dot com wrote:
> I'm confused as to why you think you need to give a still-dependent  
> type in the signature

Because the signature we're printing is the signature of the template, 
not the specialization.

Jason


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25185