[Bug c++/37376] No standard mangling for char16/32_t yet

[kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com]

------- Comment #1 from kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2008-09-04 19:12 -------
The vendor extension mangling was based on the following email as feedback on
the original patch:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg01622.html

The original suggested mangling was:

    char16_t -> k
    char32_t -> q

I believe that there was some potential contention on using 'q' due to another
proposal requesting that same symbol.  Is there any information from the ABI
committee on which symbols can be used for the mangling of these two types?


-- 

kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kris dot van dot hees at
                   |                            |oracle dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37376