[Bug tree-optimization/37810] Bad store sinking job

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-12 15:29 -------
It looks like the testcase in comment #2 should be fixed by SSUPRE?  We have

  *p = ...;
  if ()
    foo();

where foo() is an "implicit" store to *p.  Still store sinking should be
applied
to the subloop.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37810