[Bug c++/37806] New: CV-qualifiers on function typedef's are inconsistently accepted depending on typedef scope
andrew at nelless dot net
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Oct 11 19:51:00 GMT 2008
Hi,
First of all this is my first bug report to GNU GCC so please bare with me.
The issue I having is with typedef assisted declarations of class/struct member
functions. It seems to me that cv-qualifiers on function typedef's are treated
inconsistantly depending on the scope of the typedef.
The below code demonstrates the problem: with NS_SCOPE defined the code
compiles fine with "-Wall -Wextra -pedantic" on 4.3.2 but when NS_SCOPE is
undefined, the const qualifier is ignored with "error: ignoring ÂconstÂ
qualifiers added to function type". To me this seems completely inconsistent
and there is no explaination as to why the qualifer is ignored.
---snip---
#include <iostream>
#ifdef NS_SCOPE
typedef void (function_type)(int) const;
#endif
template <typename T>
struct S1
{
#ifndef NS_SCOPE
typedef void (function_type)(int) const;
#endif
};
struct S2: public S1<int>
{
virtual function_type f = 0;
};
struct S3: public S2
{
void
f (int i) const
{
std::cout << "Hello world: " << i << std::endl;
}
};
int
main()
{
S3 s;
s.f(5);
}
---snip---
I did find a C++ defect report that may be relevent, but to be honest, i'm not
certain what is going on with regard to the standard here
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html#295
I hope this can be resolved because it will allow for some really groovy
template
generated interfaces.
Visual Studio 2005 (the only other compiler I have to hand) seems to compile
this
code without NS_SCOPE defined, but I'm uncertain how to thoroughly test this
there.
--
Summary: CV-qualifiers on function typedef's are inconsistently
accepted depending on typedef scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: andrew at nelless dot net
GCC host triplet: x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37806
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list