[Bug c++/37762] Member variable of empty base optimized (EBO) class appears on wrong offset

[david dot rosenborg at pantor dot com]

------- Comment #3 from david dot rosenborg at pantor dot com  2008-10-07 09:31 -------
Ah, no, I wasn't aware of that document. I just thought that gcc was treating
the Good and Bad cases inconsitently.

Now, in layman's terms, is the reason for the padding that no two distinct
instances of Empty may share the same address? If that is the case, it would
explain the padding and this is not a bug.

Sorry, should have investigated more before hitting the commit button.

/David


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37762