[Bug fortran/36463] gfc_get_default_type(): Bad symbol

[burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #20 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-28 12:52 -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> Since comment #13 is fixed, this should not be labeled a regression any more I
> guess. Are there still problems with comment #12 (apart from PR35810), or can
> we close this PR?

I think only PR 35971, comment 0 (with modification of PR 35971 comment 2) and
[essentially/exactly the same] comment 12 of this PR remain (= compiles, but
ICE at run time).

I don't see ad hoc whether PR 35810 is the problem; if you close this PR, can
you add a note to the PR that one should re-check PR 35971, comment 0 and PR
36463, comment 12 before closing? That way we are sure that the test case does
not get lost, if PR 35810 does not fix the remaining issues.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36463