[Bug target/38130] [4.4 regression]__builtin_alloca (vs IRA?) testsuite failures on mingw32
dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Nov 18 05:57:00 GMT 2008
------- Comment #5 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-11-18 05:55 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=16713)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16713&action=view) [edit]
> gcc44-pr38130.patch
>
> I've talked about this with Honza on IRC:
> <honza> I would just use "0" constraint. At least in old times with regmove,
> regmove was able to discover that it should use same pseudo for input and
> output. If you use pair of "=a" and "a" only reload sees this fact
> <honza> so patch is OK with that change.
> This is an updated patch which uses "0" instead of "a" constraint for operand
> 1.
> So, can anyone please test it? Thanks.
>
This patch bootstraps on mingw32 (c,c++,gfortran) successfully, libstcd++ now
compiles and the two testcases reported as failing now pass.
A full regtest is in progress and so far looks good.
Thanks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38130
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list