[Bug fortran/37779] Missing RECURSIVE not detected
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Nov 15 08:32:00 GMT 2008
------- Comment #1 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-15 08:30 -------
I'll take this one on. Reading quickly through the thread gives me the
impression that it is not 100% agreed upon that this should in every case be an
error (although of course nearly so). But I guess we want to reject it
anyways, don't we?
Or should we do something like warn on std=gnu and reject for std=f95?
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-11-15 08:30:57
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37779
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list