[Bug tree-optimization/36054] bad code generation with -ftree-vectorize

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-05-05 09:14 -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> Comment #c16 doesn't make sense.  Of course malloc(3) can't be changed to
> return 
> alignment, that would break all programs out there, violate many standards,
> etc.

Right now malloc violates the C standard with respect of alignment.  I am not
saying we should add an alignment argument to malloc but if the standard there
is an alignment on the returned value, likewise for operator new.

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36054