[Bug c++/33878] Pure virtual method body omitted from template

[yuriry at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #6 from yuriry at gmail dot com  2008-03-31 20:01 -------
Yes, it is legal, sorry confusion.
Yuri

(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > I believe that the main problem here is that GCC allows defining pure virtual
> > functions.
> 
> No, that's perfectly legal.
> W.
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33878