[Bug c++/35262] [4.4 Regression]: FAIL: abi_check

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

------- Comment #16 from hubicka at ucw dot cz  2008-03-04 07:03 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.4 Regression]: FAIL: abi_check

> Note however, that the patch also didn't help Geoff's i686-linux tester, just
> have a look to gcc-testresults.

Sorry, I had two versions of patch and managed to commit the wrong copy.
Sent correct one to ML.  It should be fixed now.
> 
> 
> I think we should not mix the two issues, here. The first issue is that, IMO,
> the function we are discussing should be inlined, it's very small and we always
> inlined it until recently.

The point I wanted to make is that inliner when knowing to be inlining a
cold call (because it was hinted so by __builtin_expect) is correctly a
lot more sellective.  Basically anything that expands to function call
and some extra code around is a loss for code size inlining.

Honza


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35262