[Bug tree-optimization/34864] array constants after inlining and "staticification"

[rguenther at suse dot de]

------- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de  2008-02-14 10:14 -------
Subject: Re:  array constants after inlining
 and "staticification"

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, tbptbp at gmail dot com wrote:

> ------- Comment #4 from tbptbp at gmail dot com  2008-02-14 10:02 -------
> Hmm. If i correctly understand what you're saying, *cough*, ldexp should be
> immune to this missed-folding-because-a-builtin-isn't-recognized-as-such; but

yes

> in the original code that lead to PR34774 there's nothing but ldexp, yet *some*
> of them occur at runtime under some weird conditions.

I'd like to see a testcase for this as this would be a bug ;)

Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34864