[Bug c++/35106] Unconsistent handling of overloaded vs default arguments to functions

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-06 18:10 -------
I still don't understand what you are asking?  Do you have an example of where
the differences comes into play?  The only one I Know of is taking the address
of the function, The default argument case cannot be assigned to a function
pointer that takes less than the arguments (that means it needs to include the
default arguments in the function pointer). 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35106